Slovakia Cesta I. Triedy (svki)

[michih]

Generally, I think Cesta I. Triedy is better than Ciest I. Triedy.

I've reviewed the system. My comments:

I2:
II505 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.204870&lon=17.042842
D2(62) should be renamed to 62(D2)
D2(61) should be renamed to 61(D2)


I10:
II447_E should be renamed to II487_E, concurrent E442 too
II447_W should be renamed to II487_W, concurrent E442 too


I16:
I72/531 should be renamed to I72 (or I72/II531), concurrent E58 and E571 too


I18:
II539 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.066443&lon=20.140278
II536_N http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.015265&lon=20.441855
II536 should be renamed to II536_S
2 shaping points per curve b/n Kor and Sir
II554 should be renamed to II554_S
II554_N http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.857819&lon=21.756867
II582 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.752037&lon=21.900553


I49:
ii507 should be renamed to II507


I51:
DW504_E should be renamed to II504_E (or II504/560)
Most of "R1" wps should be renamed R1(xx) to xx(R1)


I59:
UliSNP should be renamed to II520_E


I61:
D1(4) should be renamed to 4(D1)
D1(6) should be renamed to 6(D1)


I62:
Exceeds limits b/n II503 and II510


I63:
II506_N should be renamed to II506
PriPan http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=47.764498&lon=18.109245


I64:
II593 should be renamed to II593_Dra
II593_Par http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.628892&lon=18.355601


I65:
Some R1 wps should be renamed R1(xx) to xx(R1)


I66:
Some R1 wps should be renamed R1(xx) to xx(R1)
II591 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.733213&lon=19.149792


I67:
2 shaping points per curve b/n II535 and UliBud


I72:
2 shaping points per curve b/n Jar and VysBoca


I74:
Exceeds limits b/n I18 and Bre
II558A http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.929492&lon=21.871891
Exceeds limits b/n I74A_E and UliPar
UliPar schould be moved a little bit
UIiSta should be renamed to UliSta


I75/I75A:
According to OSM, I75 is located on the southern bypass and the northern bypass is indicated to be I35


I65/I76:
I76 begins at R1 according to GM and OSM
I65 is concurrent with I76 according to GM but interupted according to OSM


I76:
UliTov should be renamed to II564
DW580 should be renamed to I580

I77:
DW543 should be renamed to I543
Exceeds limits b/n I68_S and I77A
Routed via Bardejov bypass?
DW545_S should be renamed to II545_S
DW545_N should be renamed to II545_N


I78:
Exceeds limits b/n I59 and UliCrc

[michih]

I2:
II505 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.204870&lon=17.042842

It's signed (see GSV at D4Stu end) and belongs to the potential tier 5 system. Is there any reason why it's not applied?

[si404]

I2:
II505 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.204870&lon=17.042842

It's signed (see GSV at D4Stu end) and belongs to the potential tier 5 system. Is there any reason why it's not applied?

http://tm.teresco.org/hb/?u=si404&r=svk.i002 <- err, it's there!

[michih]

Sorry, my bad. There're two II505 wps, the 2nd one is missing:

II505 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.266377&lon=17.030396