Author Topic: TN: I-269 extension over TN-385 to I-40  (Read 84 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rickmastfan67

  • TM Collaborator (A)
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 425
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 03:41:12 am
TN: I-269 extension over TN-385 to I-40
« on: September 13, 2017, 02:43:02 am »
http://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=1329.msg2257937#msg2257937
https://www.tdot.tn.gov/PublicDocuments//Construction/Design_CADD_Files/October%206,%202017%20Letting/Region%204/125391-00-RoadwayInfoOnly.pdf

Not sure when the chance is going to is going to start happening, but with the signing plans being posted, I would at least recommend updating the 'I-269 Future' file with the new exit numbers ahead of it being posted as a true Interstate finally so there is less of a chance to have damaged list files in the future.

This was already approved by the AASHTO back in Spring '16 meeting, though at the time, TN only posted it from the MS state line to TN-385 when that new highway opened.

Offline mapcat

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 453
  • Last Login:Today at 12:04:40 am
Re: TN: I-269 extension over TN-385 to I-40
« Reply #1 on: September 13, 2017, 03:46:10 pm »
Exit numbers updated, pull request submitted. IMO it's not time to remove the "future" banner until the signs change.
Clinched:

Offline rickmastfan67

  • TM Collaborator (A)
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 425
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 03:41:12 am
Re: TN: I-269 extension over TN-385 to I-40
« Reply #2 on: September 13, 2017, 04:06:33 pm »
Exit numbers updated, pull request submitted. IMO it's not time to remove the "future" banner until the signs change.

Fully agree with you on the 'future' part.  That's why I said in my original post that only the future I-269 file should be updated at this time.

Offline mapcat

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 453
  • Last Login:Today at 12:04:40 am
Re: TN: I-269 extension over TN-385 to I-40
« Reply #3 on: September 13, 2017, 05:56:42 pm »
Just clarifying my intentions since I wasn't sure what you meant by "at least" in your first post.
Clinched: