Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]
91
Solved Highway data updates / Re: DE: Extend DE 16 east to Broadkill Beach
« Last post by yakra on January 04, 2018, 03:33:00 pm »
I looked at CENTER_LINE.shp, dated 2014-06-03, and ROUTES.shp dated 2014-06-13.
More current than the cmap threads, yes. Ain't exactly 2018, though.
92
Solved Highway data updates / Re: DE: Extend DE 16 east to Broadkill Beach
« Last post by oscar on January 04, 2018, 03:20:48 pm »
One thing that has changed, is that OSM now shows DE 16 ending at Broadkill Beach. Google Maps also shows DE 16 east of DE 1.

The last DE 16 signage is just east of DE 1. The lack of signage on the remaining ~3.7 miles to Broadkill Beach doesn't say much, given the short distance. True, there's no END sign, but then the road turns to sand in Broadkill Beach. The only unclarity is whether it ends at Bay Shore Drive (where OSM puts the route end), at Bay Front Road a short block to the east, or at pavement's end an even shorter distance farther east.

FWIW, Wikipedia has DE 16 ending in Broadkill Beach, though is imprecise about where in Broadkill Beach.

Are there more current shapefiles than those cited in the earlier threads on the CHM forum?
93
Solved Highway data updates / Re: DE: Extend DE 16 east to Broadkill Beach
« Last post by yakra on January 04, 2018, 02:10:52 pm »
Prior discussion on the old CHM forum:
http://clinched.s2.bizhat.com/viewtopic.php?t=776
http://clinched.s2.bizhat.com/viewtopic.php?t=1641
It doesn't appear to me that the situation has changed since then, enough to justify an extension.
95
Updates to Highway Data / Re: ON: {407} extension & {418}
« Last post by oscar on January 04, 2018, 09:06:03 am »
I don't like the idea of tampering with the province's assigned route numbers, just to comply with our internal rules on unsigned routes. If ON 418 is unsigned, it almost certainly won't be for long.

I'd just create a short ON 418 route file including an ON407 label at its north end (to be renamed later), and label the new east end of ON 407 as ON418 until it gets an exit number.
96
Updates to Highway Data / ON: {407} extension & {418}
« Last post by rickmastfan67 on January 04, 2018, 08:29:33 am »
Quote from: AsphaltPlanet
^ The exit numbers are as follows:
Endfield Road is signed as 132
The 418 interchange is unnumberd (traffic doesn't have a choice, but to navigate the 80km/h off-ramp)
Taunton Road is signed as 8

Although Hwy 418 is technically open between the 407 interchange and Taunton Road, there are no signs that correspond to Hwy 418.

Thinking of just 'temporarily' extending {407} down {418} till signage changes & {407} continues over to {35}/{115}.
Opinions?
97
Updates to Highway Data / Re: NC: I-785/840 Extended to US 29
« Last post by mapmikey on January 04, 2018, 06:57:51 am »
corrected and submitted...
98
In-progress Highway Systems & Work / Re: usafl: Florida State Highways
« Last post by rickmastfan67 on January 04, 2018, 05:08:54 am »
By email from user aaroads:

Quote
Thinking about another change I wanted to mention, the alignment of FL 39 in Hillsborough County shifted from I-4 westward onto the new Alexander Street alignment. Old FL 39 north from I-4 was supposed to be designated as CR 39, but now it is signed as FL 39A. FL 39A was previously assigned along Alexander Street south from I-4. This is now part of FL 39 as well, with FL 39 wrapping around the southwest side of Plant City. The previous alignment for FL 39 south from I-4 through Downtown Plant City was turned over to the city for maintenance and decommissioned.

FDOT GIS data is confirming this finally.  This was one area where I was still a tad confused earlier with.  So, now fixing it will be a piece of cake.

=====
Also will still have to do reroute of FL-12 onto FL-269 later up in Quincy, while leaving FL-269 'for now', as I have no proof 269 will become unsigned yet.

EDIT: Now submitted.
99
Updates to Highway Data / Re: PA: PA 29 Truck around Emmaus?
« Last post by rickmastfan67 on January 04, 2018, 12:16:51 am »
As long as the route has 'real' truck banners above a PA-29 shield, I'd say add it.
100
Updates to Highway Data / Re: NC: I-785/840 Extended to US 29
« Last post by rickmastfan67 on January 03, 2018, 11:37:15 pm »
Just noticed on both I-785's and I-840 'Future''s file that the labels are all messed up.

For I-785's file, the '17' & '14' labels are missing the '(840)' part at the end since they are I-840's numbers (to prevent any future duplication problems).

For the I-840 'future' file, there are some problems with it.  All the former 'hidden' labels were deleted.  They should never have been deleted.  However, they are no longer in use, but the '(840)' part needs to be deleted, as those are it's own exit numbers.
"18(840) +19(840)" should be corrected to "18 +18(840) +19(840)"
"21(840)" should be corrected to "21 +21(840)".
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]