Author Topic: usaca (California State Highways), preview system  (Read 3872 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Bickendan

  • TM Collaborator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 171
  • Last Login:Today at 10:37:24 pm
Re: usaca (California State Highways), preview system
« Reply #105 on: November 26, 2017, 08:03:55 pm »
I suspect G/HSt was a point centered between a pair of a one-way couplet.

Offline oscar

  • TM Collaborator
  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 391
  • Last Login:Today at 11:16:28 pm
Re: usaca (California State Highways), preview system
« Reply #106 on: November 26, 2017, 08:20:58 pm »
Yes.

Offline oscar

  • TM Collaborator
  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 391
  • Last Login:Today at 11:16:28 pm
Re: usaca (California State Highways), preview system
« Reply #107 on: November 30, 2017, 01:37:08 pm »
I've finished "finalizing" all usaca routes, including synching them with each other and with California routes in active systems (usai, usaib, usaus, usausb), streamlining files to reduce shaping and other points, and truncating or splitting some routes affected by relinquishments to local maintenance.

As discussed above, I might've sometimes overdone it a little on visible waypoint removals, and am open to undoing some of them so long as the overall point density remains reasonable.

Most "near-miss-points" (out-of-synch route junctions) in CA have been eliminated or flagged as false positives. Those include a few involving the preview usanp system, which were manageable in number, and also I contributed many of usanp's California route files so I went ahead and fixed their junctions with other routes. I have not addressed the far more numerous NMPs, and associated broken concurrences, with historic routes in California. Those routes were synched with older versions of usaca and other files while I was still working on them, and will need to be re-synched later (preferably after usaca is activated).

I think all broken concurrences among usaca/usai/usaib/usaus/usausb routes have been eliminated. Any that I've missed, please let me know.

There are still relinquishments I need to figure out how to handle, including but not limited to CA 82 in San Jose, CA 39 in Buena Park, CA 2 between I-405 and West Hollywood, and most of CA 19. I'll address those, and others I think won't require route file changes (including but not limited to CA 146 in Soledad, and parts of CA 58 and 178 in Bakersfield), later.
« Last Edit: November 30, 2017, 05:53:45 pm by oscar »

Online yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1102
  • Last Login:Today at 11:31:49 pm
Re: usaca (California State Highways), preview system
« Reply #108 on: December 22, 2017, 01:37:04 am »
Quote
I think all broken concurrences among usaca/usai/usaib/usaus/usausb routes have been eliminated. Any that I've missed, please let me know.
I-280 @ 48 is centered on San Pedro Rd.
CA1 @ 48(280) is centered on Washington St.

Offline oscar

  • TM Collaborator
  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 391
  • Last Login:Today at 11:16:28 pm
Re: usaca (California State Highways), preview system
« Reply #109 on: December 22, 2017, 08:34:18 pm »
Pull request submitted to fix broken CA 1/I-280 concurrence. Also adds back CA 187 (looks like I jumped the gun on its relinquishment), and tweaks CA 19 to lay groundwork for additional changes including perhaps adding back CA 164 (similar to CA 260, signed as part of CA 19 rather than its legislative route number).